The Eurasian Journal of Medicine
Review

Myocardial Protection in Cardiac Surgery: Exploring the Influence of Anesthetic Agents

1.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Türkiye

2.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye

3.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun Training and Research Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Türkiye

4.

UOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit “Sant’Antonio”, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy

Eurasian J Med 2023; 55: Supplement 138-141
DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.23376
Read: 441 Downloads: 139 Published: 29 December 2023

This review assesses the efficacy of inhalation anesthetics and propofol in cardiac surgery, primarily focusing on their impact on myocardial protection and subsequent clinical outcomes. The review provides a concise summary of the current scientific information regarding the protective efects of inhalation anesthetics and propofol, particularly in the context of ischemia–reperfusion injury during cardiac surgery. The review delves into the mechanisms of action and discusses clinical studies comparing the 2 anesthetic strategies regarding mortality, complication rates, and length of hospital stay.

Inhalation anesthetics exhibit cardioprotective properties through many mechanisms, such as preconditioning, scavenging of free radicals, and stabilizing mitochondria. Propofol demonstrates certain protective benefits but does not possess the preconditioning capability of inhalation medications. Clinical investigations yield contradictory findings, as several studies indicate enhanced outcomes with inhalation anesthetics, while others observe no substantial disparity between the 2 approaches. The cardioprotective efcacy of propofol against ischemia–reperfusion injury remains limited. While its inherent antioxidant properties ofer direct myocardial protection, propofol demonstrably lacks the preconditioning-mediated signaling pathways triggered by inhalation anesthetics. As a result, propofol’s protective efect may be slightly inferior to preconditioning strategies, and its potential to inhibit organ-protective impact of other interventions needs further investigation.

The question of which anesthetic approach ofers superior myocardial protection remains debatable. Current evidence is inconclusive, potentially due to patient heterogeneity, surgical complexity, and methodological limitations of existing studies. Future research, including pharmacogenetic studies and large, welldesigned, randomized controlled trials, are necessary to provide definitive guidance on anesthetic selection for optimal myocardial protection in cardiac surgery.

Cite this article as: Dost B, Turunc E, Sarikaya Ozel E, et al. Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery: Exploring the influence of anesthetic agents. Eurasian J Med., 2023;55(Suppl. Issue: 1): S138-S141.

Files
EISSN 1308-8742